<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Max Factor Lash Extension Effect Mascara</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cosmetic-candy.com/review-max-factor-lash-extension-effect-mascara/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cosmetic-candy.com/review-max-factor-lash-extension-effect-mascara/</link>
	<description>Cosmetic-Candy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: maya</title>
		<link>http://cosmetic-candy.com/review-max-factor-lash-extension-effect-mascara/comment-page-1/#comment-9857</link>
		<dc:creator>maya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmetic-candy.com/?p=10713#comment-9857</guid>
		<description>&quot;lash extension effect&quot; and &quot;false lashes&quot; are different MF mascaras. i didn&#039;t try the &quot;false&quot; one but the &quot;extension&quot; is indeed a clean mascara, no clumps, good definition but not much volume or lenght. it&#039;s ok for daily use but not for events when you would like some spectacular lashes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lash extension effect&#8221; and &#8220;false lashes&#8221; are different MF mascaras. i didn&#8217;t try the &#8220;false&#8221; one but the &#8220;extension&#8221; is indeed a clean mascara, no clumps, good definition but not much volume or lenght. it&#8217;s ok for daily use but not for events when you would like some spectacular lashes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryinwonder</title>
		<link>http://cosmetic-candy.com/review-max-factor-lash-extension-effect-mascara/comment-page-1/#comment-6751</link>
		<dc:creator>maryinwonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmetic-candy.com/?p=10713#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>Max Factor mascaras were my HGs for a long time...before meeting Diorshow and MUFE Aqua Smokey Eyes. With those I had to say bye-bye to smudging and straight lashes! ^.^ 
Now I have to say...anything MF and &quot;false&quot; is a big red sign to me not go close to that mascara....false lash effect? don&#039;t make me laugh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max Factor mascaras were my HGs for a long time&#8230;before meeting Diorshow and MUFE Aqua Smokey Eyes. With those I had to say bye-bye to smudging and straight lashes! ^.^<br />
Now I have to say&#8230;anything MF and &#8220;false&#8221; is a big red sign to me not go close to that mascara&#8230;.false lash effect? don&#8217;t make me laugh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chica</title>
		<link>http://cosmetic-candy.com/review-max-factor-lash-extension-effect-mascara/comment-page-1/#comment-6401</link>
		<dc:creator>Chica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmetic-candy.com/?p=10713#comment-6401</guid>
		<description>Ashley - I may be well out with this but when MaxFactor False Lash Effect was launched (my fave mascara ever) on the adverts it said it was Covergirl Lash Blast repackaged for the UK market (we don&#039;t have access to Covergirl) 
This might be the same for other mascaras?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashley &#8211; I may be well out with this but when MaxFactor False Lash Effect was launched (my fave mascara ever) on the adverts it said it was Covergirl Lash Blast repackaged for the UK market (we don&#8217;t have access to Covergirl)<br />
This might be the same for other mascaras?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

